ArticleAIDS and behavior2026
What Do People with HIV Want to Know About Long-Acting Injectable Cabotegravir/Rilpivirine?
Article in AIDS and behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Transitioning from oral to injectable HIV therapy raises unique considerations. We examined the scope and types of questions that people with HIV (PWH) raised about long-acting cabotegravir and rilpivirine (LA-CAB/RPV). We conducted semi-structured interviews with patients at four urban HIV clinics in San Francisco, Chicago, and Atlanta (n = 131). Two cross-sectional samples were recruited during August 2020 to May 2023: (1) pre-implementation, prior to widespread clinical availability (n = 72); and (2) early adopters of LA-CAB/RPV (n = 59). Each dataset was analyzed separately and comparatively using thematic analysis. Participants were 65% male, 45% Black and 27% Latine with median age of 46 years. Questions clustered into four domains: (1) potential side effects; (2) effectiveness; (3) injection visit logistics; and (4) comparison to other injectable medications. Early adopters emphasized the importance of cultivating broader awareness about LA-CAB/RPV. Findings highlight the need for clear, patient-centered information across multiple domains to support informed decisions about LA-CAB/RPV initiation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850545What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.