Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42850483›Full record

ArticleArchives of sexual behavior2026

Facial Asymmetry and Sexuality in Women.

Natalia Jaguszewska, Grazyna Jasienska, Urszula M Marcinkowska

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Archives of sexual behavior, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Natalia JaguszewskaFaculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Skawinska St 8, 31-066, Cracow, Poland.
Grazyna JasienskaFaculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Skawinska St 8, 31-066, Cracow, Poland.
Urszula M MarcinkowskaFaculty of Health Sciences, Jagiellonian University Medical College, Skawinska St 8, 31-066, Cracow, Poland. urszula.marcinkowska@uj.edu.pl.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6851-4513

Funding

Narodowe Centrum Nauki 2014/12/S/NZ8/00722Polsko-Amerykanska Komisja Fulbrighta PL/2018/42/SR
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

People perceive more symmetrical individuals as more attractive; therefore, facial symmetry has been linked to mate selection. Being perceived as more attractive could also increase women's indirect reproductive benefits that would follow from pronounced sexuality and enhanced mating. Sexuality can be examined either as long-term, through sociosexual orientation, or through current sexual activity and desire. This study explored the relationship between facial asymmetry and female sexuality, while taking into account a relationship status and, due to the potential differences in facial asymmetry between female from rural and urban areas, the place of residence. Long-term sexuality was measured with the three subscales of the Sociosexual Orientation Inventory (SOI-R): Behavior, Attitude, and Desire. Current sexual activity and desire were assessed with questions about their frequency and intensity (based on the Female Sexual Function Index). Simple correlations revealed a weak, negative association between facial asymmetry and the number of sexual partners in the last year (ρ = - .23, 95% CI [- 0.45, 0.01], p = .047), SOI Attitude (ρ = - .25, 95% CI [- 0.44, - 0.03], p = .031), and sexual desire (ρ = - .21, 95% CI [- 0.43, - 0,00], p = .082). However, these effects were no longer significant after including place of residence as a confounder (.42 < p < .91). These results highlight the importance of external conditions when investigating correlates of facial asymmetry.

Indexed as

Facial shapeFluctuating asymmetryMate selectionSexual activitySociosexual orientation

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.