ArticleAnnals of biomedical engineering2026
Detecting Intervention-Specific Change in Soft Tissue Mobility Aligned with Regional Pain Through Optically Measured Skin Surface Strains.
Article in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeSoft tissue manipulation (STM) is a widely used massage-based intervention for myofascial pain, yet its effects on soft tissue mobility are primarily assessed through subjective clinical observations. Mechanical changes underlying symptom relief therefore remain unclear. No objective gold standard exists; current methods either measure stiffness in small regions, missing lateral mobility between fascial layers, or rely on clinical palpation. Optical measurement of tissue mobility from the skin surface offers an objective approach compatible with clinical practice.
methodsDigital image correlation captured skin surface deformation during hands-on assessment of the cervicothoracic region. Nineteen participants underwent a standardized STM protocol. Tissue mobility was measured immediately before and after intervention, considering tissue pull direction (superior vs. inferior) and bilateral anatomy (left vs. right). Eleven strain-based biomarkers evaluated tissue glide and deformation.
resultsSeveral biomarkers changed significantly following intervention, with maximum pull increasing 3.4 mm. STM produced tissue mobility changes in nearly all treated participants, with 88% improving on at least one body side. Among participants with baseline bilateral pain asymmetries, 90% showed greater mobility gains on their more painful side. Bilateral mobility asymmetries were observed in 53% of participants, eight of whom reported pain asymmetries; in all cases, the less mobile side corresponded to the more painful side.
conclusionOptically derived tissue glide and deformation measures can objectively detect soft tissue mobility changes immediately following STM. Mobility gains align with self-reported pain, supporting the clinical relevance of strain-based biomarkers and their potential to complement clinical assessment of myofascial restriction and therapeutic response.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850477What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.