ArticleInternational journal of biometeorology2026
Intersections of climate and society: cold stress vulnerability in Northern Norway.
Article in International journal of biometeorology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Extreme cold profoundly shapes health, livelihoods, and social well-being in northern communities, yet research on social vulnerability to such conditions remains limited. This study provides a framework for integrating social, demographic, infrastructural, and institutional dimensions into an assessment of vulnerability to extreme cold in northern Norway. It utilizes the Extremely Cold Social Vulnerability Index (ECSVI, ranging from 0 to 1) derived from the Universal Thermal Climate Index (UTCI), and indices of social sensitivity and social adaptivity for 83 communities across Nordland, Troms, and Finnmark in Northern Norway during 2000-2019. Finnmark experienced substantially greater cold exposure than Nordland and Troms, although annual exposure to UTCI < - 27 °C declined from 1011 to 883 h between 2000 and 2009 and 2010-2019. ECSVI showed marked regional differences, with Finnmark remaining the most vulnerable county (0.69 and 0.67 in two decades), compared with substantially lower values in Troms and Nordland. At the community level, Social Sensitivity ranged from 0.27 to 0.61 and Social Adaptivity from 0.39 to 0.64. Low-income households (r = 0.64), foreign-born population (r = 0.62), and income inequality (r = 0.60) showed the strongest positive associations with Social Sensitivity. Infrastructure metrics such as connectivity to the municipal water supply (r = 0.61) and roads with street lighting (r = 0.46) were the highest correlators with Social Adaptivity. Overall, the results demonstrate that vulnerability to extreme cold reflects the combined effects of climatic exposure and socioeconomic conditions, while stronger adaptive capacity can reduce vulnerability. By quantifying vulnerability across and within regions, this study offers actionable insights for targeted adaptation and resilience planning.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850469What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.