Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42850465›Full record

ArticlePediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany)2026

Development and validation of prediction models for any and severe acute kidney injury in children with sepsis.

Yuan Li, Qian Chen

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Pediatric nephrology (Berlin, Germany), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Yuan LiInstitute of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China.
Qian ChenInstitute of Pediatrics, Children's Hospital of Nanjing Medical University, Nanjing, PR China. js_chenqian@sina.com.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSepsis-associated acute kidney injury (SA-AKI) is a serious complication in children. We developed and validated models to predict any AKI and severe AKI in pediatric sepsis.

methodsThis retrospective study included 375 children who met the Phoenix sepsis criteria between January 2019 and December 2025. Patients who developed AKI during the first 24 h were excluded. Outcomes were any AKI (KDIGO stages 1-3) and severe AKI (stages 2-3) occurring from 24 h through day 7. Patients were randomly divided into training and validation cohorts (7:3). Predictors were selected using LASSO followed by multivariable logistic regression. Model performance was assessed using the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC), calibration curves, and decision curve analysis.

resultsNew-onset AKI occurred in 111 patients (29.6%), including 90 (24.0%) with severe AKI. The any AKI model included age, mechanical ventilation, activated partial thromboplastin time, uric acid, and cystatin C. Its AUCs were 0.911 (95% CI, 0.874-0.948) and 0.911 (95% CI, 0.854-0.968) in the training and validation cohorts. The severe AKI model included lactate, activated partial thromboplastin time, blood urea nitrogen, and uric acid, with corresponding AUCs of 0.864 (95% CI, 0.809-0.919) and 0.897 (95% CI, 0.817-0.977). Both models showed acceptable calibration and positive net benefit. Sensitivity analyses using an alternative baseline serum creatinine definition yielded similar results.

conclusionsTwo models based on routinely available early variables showed good internal performance for predicting any AKI and severe AKI in pediatric sepsis. External validation is required before clinical implementation.

Indexed as

Acute kidney injuryNomogramPediatric sepsisPrediction modelSevere acute kidney injury

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.