ArticleProtoplasma2026
EMA-based chromosome preparation and fluorescent banding as an aid to detect adulteration in cultivated Lens culinaris.
Article in Protoplasma, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
India, the world's largest consumer and importer of lentils, is concerned about intentional or unintentional adulteration of this high-protein staple, which compromises food security, local price stability, and efforts to boost per capita lentil production to reduce costly imports. In this study, cost-effective EMA-based chromosomal analysis using Giemsa and fluorescence staining confirms the presence of a mixed population of lentils growing in farmers' fields in West Bengal, raising quality concerns for lentil farmers in these areas. Moreover, the adulterant is identified as a very closely related germplasm of wild-type lentils, L. ervoides, by cluster analysis based on comparative chromosome analysis against the previously reported Lentil database. The karyomorphological features, such as the terminal secondary constrictions, 18-20 DAPI-positive signals in all chromosomes, and CMA-positive signals at nucleolar regions, along with seed and flower morphology and the presence of tendrils, effectively differentiate cultivated lentils from wild-type (adulterant) lentil germplasm. Cluster analysis also indicates that the adulterant is more closely related to wild-type lentil L. ervoides. This method provides an important tool for quality control and seed authentication in lentils and helps to enhance farmers' productivity, boost the economy, improve consumers' nutrition, and contribute to national productivity and GDP. Moreover, it emphasizes the need to create a national database of Indian lentil germplasm and develop region-specific certified germplasm programs to optimize per capita lentil production, considering the diverse agronomic conditions across India.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850464What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.