ArticleBundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz2026
[Barriers to cycling for transportation: findings from the population-based survey "Health in Germany"].
Article in Bundesgesundheitsblatt, Gesundheitsforschung, Gesundheitsschutz, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTraveling by bicycle rather than by car has a wide range of positive effects on individual and public health. As the proportion of journeys made by bicycle in Germany is currently low, this article examines the barriers to everyday cycling and differences between socio-demographic groups.
methodsAs part of the 2025 annual survey of the Robert Koch Institute's population-based panel "Health in Germany," adults were asked about their everyday use of bicycles and the barriers to cycling. Differences between socio-demographic groups were examined using regression analyses. Data from 32,374 individuals were included in the analyses.
resultsThe five most frequently cited barriers were poor weather conditions (51.1%), distances being too long (45.1%), not wanting to arrive at the destination sweaty (42.8%), transporting luggage or passengers (34.4%), and a lack of changing rooms and showers (31.9%). Significant differences were observed between socio-demographic groups: safety-related barriers were more relevant for women, whilst for older people and those with a lower level of formal education, their own health and fitness, as well as the lack of a (good) bicycle, were more significant. People living in rural areas were more likely to cite journeys that were too long or too hilly. DISCUSSION: The results show that barriers to cycling exist at both the environmental and individual levels, and therefore measures are required at multiple levels. In particular, the needs of population groups who have so far used bicycles less frequently should be addressed to reduce barriers and promote health equity.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850437What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.