ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Phantom system for endotracheal tube cuff seal testing during mechanical ventilation.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Leakage of orogastric secretions past endotracheal tube (ETT) cuffs contributes to ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP), yet in vivo tracheal seal testing is impractical, requiring phantom evaluation. As the rigid cylinder specified in EN ISO 5361:2023 does not adequately represent in vivo airway conditions, a benchtop cuff seal testing system was developed incorporating a tracheal model, lung model, mechanical ventilation, and automatic cuff pressure control. A rigid cylinder and a bio-inspired tracheal model with tissue-like mechanical properties were evaluated using five high-volume low-pressure (HVLP) polyvinyl chloride (PVC) cuffed ETTs and five polyurethane (PU) cuffed ETTs, with and without mechanical ventilation, and with and without automatic cuff inflation. For PVC cuffed ETTs, fluid leakage rate was highest in the cylinder phantom compared with the bio-inspired phantom, ~ 30% lower without mechanical ventilation and ~ 50% with mechanical ventilation (both p < 0.001). In contrast, PU ETTs exhibited minimal leakage. Long-term testing revealed intracuff pressure decay over 48 h at 37 °C for both PVC (12.24 ± 1.13 cmH2O) and PU (9.06 ± 1.00 cmH2O) cuffed ETTs, while automatic cuff pressure control further reduced leakage for PVC ETTs. The bio-inspired phantom revealed sealing behaviours not captured by cylinder testing, supporting clinically relevant evaluation of ETT sealing performance and cuff materials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850433What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.