ArticleMedical & biological engineering & computing2026
Cardiovascular function changes following lung resection: a computational model to compare afterload increase and contractility loss mechanisms.
Article in Medical & biological engineering & computing, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Functional limitation after lung resection surgery has been consistently documented in clinical studies, and right ventricle (RV) dysfunction has been hypothesized as a contributing factor. However, the mechanisms of RV dysfunction after lung resection remain unclear, particularly whether change in afterload or contractility is the underlying cause. This study reviews the clinical literature on this topic and proposes a lumped parameter model to simulate the effects of lung resection. Our model allowed us to isolate the two mechanisms and compare them. Subsequently, the simulation outputs were compared against the literature. Our rigorous approach included local and global sensitivity analyses to evaluate the effect of model parameters, both individually and collectively. The two mechanisms produced the same trends for all outputs except three: RV systolic pressure (RVSP) and pulmonary artery systolic and diastolic pressure (PASP and PADP) changed in opposite directions. Furthermore, our model indicates that obtaining pressure measurements in the clinic may help quantify the precise combination of the two mechanisms. This study presents the first mathematical model of the effect of lung resection on the cardiovascular system. Further refinement, combined with additional clinical data, will help us predict RV dysfunction and pave the way towards improving outcomes for lung cancer patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850432What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.