ReviewNature reviews. Clinical oncology2026
Right-sizing treatment for HER2-positive breast cancer: evolving algorithms across the disease continuum.
Review in Nature reviews. Clinical oncology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Human epidermal growth factor receptor 2 (HER2)-positive breast cancer has undergone one of the most profound therapeutic transformations in oncology. Once associated with poor outcomes, it is now a highly curable disease in the early-stage setting, and a substantial proportion of patients with metastatic disease survive beyond 5 years. This progress reflects the development of multiple HER2-targeted therapies, including monoclonal antibodies, antibody-drug conjugates and tyrosine-kinase inhibitors. Most notably, the HER2-targeted antibody-drug conjugate trastuzumab deruxtecan has rapidly been moved into earlier lines of therapy, with emerging roles in the first-line metastatic setting, adjuvant treatment of high-risk residual disease and neoadjuvant therapy. This expansion creates new opportunities, but also crucial evidence gaps regarding optimal sequencing, retreatment and selection of patients for treatment intensification. As treatment options expand, the central challenge is to right-size therapy across the disease continuum, which is the focus of this Review. In patients with early-stage disease, this right-sizing involves carefully de-intensifying treatment for those with low-risk tumours, optimizing neoadjuvant chemotherapy backbones and escalating therapy for those with residual disease; in patients with advanced-stage disease, it requires optimizing maintenance treatment strategies (for example, using palbociclib or tucatinib) after induction therapy, while integrating these maintenance regimens with the novel option of first-line trastuzumab deruxtecan plus pertuzumab, for which the optimal treatment duration and subsequent sequencing remain uncertain. Tissue, plasma and dynamic imaging-based biomarkers are beginning to inform this process, with several showing promising potential for clinical implementation.
Identifiers
42850399What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.