Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42850353›Full record

Articlenpj health systems2026

Renegotiating autonomy and safety: disentangling tensions emerging for older adults living with smart monitoring systems.

Laura Detels, Mingsong Zhai, Zhao Cai, Manuel Trenz

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Laura DetelsUniversity of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0002-8470-682X
Mingsong ZhaiUniversity of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, China.
Zhao CaiUniversity of Nottingham Ningbo China, Ningbo, China.
Manuel TrenzUniversity of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany. trenz@uni-goettingen.de.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Smart monitoring systems (SMS) are increasingly deployed in community-based care to empower older adults to live safely and independently. However, existing research largely treats monitoring as a process in which continuous data collection and real-time alerts are intended to translate into improved outcomes. What remains underexplored is how older adults experience monitoring and how it shapes their behavior over time. In this qualitative longitudinal study, 21 older adults are accompanied from SMS installation for more than one year, with individual semi-structured interviews conducted across four data collection phases. Findings reveal that older adults actively anticipate how the system interprets their behavior, producing three responses: reactance, that is, disengaging from devices to reclaim autonomy over safety; preemptive behavior, for instance, restructuring daily routines to avoid triggering alerts constraining their autonomy and safety; and performative compliance, that is, managing behavior to satisfy caregivers rather than personal needs, leading to a loss of autonomy. These constitute autonomy-safety value tensions: a technology designed to advance both values instead produces conditions under which protecting one systematically undermines the other. To this end, this study provides empirical insights into unintended consequences and a conceptual model explaining how value tensions emerge, with implications for practitioners and caregivers.

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.