Articlenpj health systems2026
Renegotiating autonomy and safety: disentangling tensions emerging for older adults living with smart monitoring systems.
Article in npj health systems, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Smart monitoring systems (SMS) are increasingly deployed in community-based care to empower older adults to live safely and independently. However, existing research largely treats monitoring as a process in which continuous data collection and real-time alerts are intended to translate into improved outcomes. What remains underexplored is how older adults experience monitoring and how it shapes their behavior over time. In this qualitative longitudinal study, 21 older adults are accompanied from SMS installation for more than one year, with individual semi-structured interviews conducted across four data collection phases. Findings reveal that older adults actively anticipate how the system interprets their behavior, producing three responses: reactance, that is, disengaging from devices to reclaim autonomy over safety; preemptive behavior, for instance, restructuring daily routines to avoid triggering alerts constraining their autonomy and safety; and performative compliance, that is, managing behavior to satisfy caregivers rather than personal needs, leading to a loss of autonomy. These constitute autonomy-safety value tensions: a technology designed to advance both values instead produces conditions under which protecting one systematically undermines the other. To this end, this study provides empirical insights into unintended consequences and a conceptual model explaining how value tensions emerge, with implications for practitioners and caregivers.
Identifiers
42850353What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.