ArticleBiological cybernetics2026
Active inference with reusable state-dependent value profiles.
Article in Biological cybernetics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Optimal behavior in volatile environments requires agents to deploy different value-control regimes across hidden latent structures. However, representing independent preferences, biases, and action confidence for every situation is computationally and statistically intractable. We introduce value profiles: a compact set of reusable parameter bundles-comprising outcome preferences, policy priors, and action precision-assigned to hidden states in a generative model. As posterior beliefs evolve trial-by-trial, effective control parameters emerge through belief-weighted mixing. This enables state-conditional strategy recruitment without the need for independent parameterization of every context. We evaluate this framework in a probabilistic reversal learning setting using simulation-based model recovery and parameter recovery, comparing profile-based models against static and uncertainty-coupled precision baselines. Model comparison favors the profile-based architecture, with consistent parameter recovery demonstrating its structural identifiability. Beyond predictive fit, we show how the framework allows for a mechanistic attribution of behavior to specific adaptive channels, distinguishing between changes in what an agent prefers and how decisively it acts. Overall, reusable value profiles provide a tractable computational account of belief-conditioned control, offering a mode-like representational scheme for behavioral flexibility that is both identifiable and theoretically grounded.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850352What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.