ArticleLeukemia2026
Measurable residual disease assessment as an early end point of treatment efficacy in acute myeloid leukemia: a multinational PETHEMA study of 2623 patients treated with intensive therapy.
Article in Leukemia, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
62 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measurable residual disease (MRD) is an early endpoint of treatment efficacy in some hematological malignancies, but several questions remain unanswered to endorse its use in acute myeloid leukemia (AML). We leveraged PETHEMA real-world outcomes of 2623 newly-diagnosed AML patients fit for intensive therapy and in complete remission (CR) after one cycle, to investigate if MRD assessment using flow cytometry is more sensitive than morphological CR, what is the optimal MRD cutoff, the individual-patient-level association between MRD negative CR and overall survival (OS), and if MRD negative rates after different induction regimens associate with different OS. MRD was detected in 68% of patients and presence of MRD levels ≥0.01-<0.1% associated with inferior OS. MRD negative CR using the 0.01% cutoff showed independent prognostic value and was significantly correlated with OS at the individual patient-level (Global odds ratio 1.23; 95% CI, 1.02-1.40). However, significance was lost in specific subgroups defined by genetic risk and post-consolidation treatment. The relationship between treatment effect in MRD negative CR rates and OS after different induction regimens was generally observed. Altogether, these results support formal studies to investigate the role of MRD as an early endpoint of treatment efficacy in specific subgroups of AML patients.
Identifiers
42850349What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.