ArticleEvidence-based dentistry2026
Salivary parameters in individuals undergoing orthodontic treatment with clear aligners: a scoping review.
Article in Evidence-based dentistry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
aimsThis scoping review aimed to map the salivary parameters investigated in children, adolescents, young adults, and adults undergoing orthodontic treatment with clear aligners, describe saliva collection and analytical assessment methods, and identify methodological gaps in the literature.
methodsThe review was reported according to PRISMA-ScR and had its protocol registered in the Open Science Framework. Searches were conducted in MEDLINE/PubMed, Scopus, Web of Science, and ProQuest, without restrictions on year or language. The initial search was performed on June 12, 2024, and updated on September 9, 2025. Two independent reviewers screened records in Rayyan, assessed full texts, and extracted data using a standardized form. Eligible studies were primary clinical investigations assessing salivary parameters in individuals undergoing clear aligner therapy. Data were synthesized descriptively, without a formal risk-of-bias appraisal.
resultsFrom 3225 records, 1917 references were screened, 28 full texts were assessed, and 22 studies from 11 countries were included. The included reports comprised 880 participants across all groups (494 clear aligner and 386 comparator participants), although potential overlap between reports cannot be excluded. Most studies were prospective observational investigations, and pediatric participants were underrepresented. Invisalign™ was the most frequently investigated aligner system, although several studies used other thermoformed appliances or did not specify the brand. The included studies varied substantially in follow-up schedules, pre-sampling instructions, saliva type, collection procedures, sample processing, storage conditions, and analytical platforms. Salivary outcomes were mapped into four domains: microbiological parameters, biochemical and immunological markers, physicochemical properties, and material-related chemical eluents. Microbiological outcomes were the most frequently mapped domain, followed by inflammatory, oxidative stress, hormonal, enzymatic, physicochemical, BPA, monomer, and metabolite-related outcomes.
conclusionThis scoping review provides a descriptive map of salivary parameters investigated during clear aligner therapy and the methods used for their collection and assessment. Methodological variability limits comparability across studies. Future research should prioritize standardized saliva collection, processing, storage, analytical reporting, age-stratified sampling, and transparent reporting of aligner materials and clinical context.
Identifiers
42850342What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.