ArticleMolecular systems biology2026
Validation and analysis of 12,000 AI-driven CAR-T designs in the Bits to Binders competition.
Article in Molecular systems biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Latent generative search unlocks de novo design of untapped biomolecular interactions at scale.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2026Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Artificial intelligence (AI) methods for proteins have advanced rapidly, improving structure prediction and design, particularly for de novo binders. However, most evaluations emphasize binding affinity rather than higher-order biological function. We present Bits to Binders, a global competition evaluating de novo binder design in the context of chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cells. Teams from 42 countries submitted 12,000 designs of 80-amino acid de novo minibinders targeting human CD20 as CAR binding domains. Designs were screened by pooled CAR-T proliferation, identifying 707 designs exhibiting significant CD20-specific enrichment, with team hit rates from 0.6% to 38.4%. Top-performing candidates were validated as individual constructs, measuring CD20-specific proliferation, expansion, cytokine production, and targeted cell lysis. We identified common design methodologies and factors correlated with DNA synthesis, expression, and target-specific T cell activation which nearly double the success rates when applied as a retrospective filter. We release this dataset as an open resource, with practical recommendations to support more effective AI-driven binder design.
Identifiers
42850288What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.