Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42850270›Full record

ArticleNature human behaviour2026

Recreational screen use and internalizing problems from preadolescence to young adulthood in a longitudinal twin cohort with co-twin comparison.

Tong Gong, Emma Frans, Anna Ohlis, Shuyang Yao, Ruyue Zhang, Anders Nilsson, Yasmina Molero, Miriam A Mosing, Isabell Brikell, Henrik Larsson and 5 more

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Nature human behaviour, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

15 authors.

Tong GongDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. tong.gong@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6887-9432
Emma FransDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Anna OhlisDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9046-5773
Shuyang YaoDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9669-4470
Ruyue ZhangDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5747-9428
Anders NilssonCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Yasmina MoleroDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Miriam A MosingDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2049-125X
Isabell BrikellDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Henrik LarssonDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.
Paul LichtensteinDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3037-5287
Lisa B ThorellDivision of Psychology, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7417-6637
Patrik Ke MagnussonDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7315-7899
Ralf Kuja-HalkolaDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3765-2067
Yi LuDepartment of Medical Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Karolinska Institutet, Stockholm, Sweden. lu.yi@ki.se.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9933-3654

Funding

Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare) 2020-01171Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare) 2023-01389Forskningsrådet om Hälsa, Arbetsliv och Välfärd (Swedish Research Council for Health, Working Life and Welfare) 2024-00238Hjärnfonden (Swedish Brain Foundation) FO2026-0404Karolinska Institutet (Karolinska Institute) 2022-02303Karolinska Institutet (Karolinska Institute) 2024-02835Stiftelsen Söderström Königska Sjukhemmet SLS-1012803Vetenskapsrådet (Swedish Research Council) 2024-06592
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The mental health impact of increasing recreational screen use among youth has raised substantial concerns, yet questions about causality remain unresolved. Here, leveraging a co-twin control design, we examined associations between screen use and internalizing problems from childhood to early adulthood among 21,797 Swedish twins, accounting for shared familial factors. Recreational screen use was associated with increased internalizing symptoms and clinical diagnosed depression and anxiety. However, these associations were substantially attenuated within discordant twin pairs and did not remain statistically significant after correction for multiple testing. These findings suggest that shared genetic and environmental factors partly explain the association between youth screen use and mental health. Although co-twin estimates provided limited evidence for clear causal effects, the association between heavy interactive screen use and clinical risk highlights the need to understand potential mechanisms linking digital behaviours and youth mental health.

Identifiers

PMID42850270

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.