Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42850260›Full record

ArticleCommunications biology2026

Global patterns are key to understanding macroevolution.

Zhen Guo, Wolfgang Kiessling

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Communications biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Zhen GuoGeoZentrum Nordbayern, Department of Geography and Geosciences, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Loewenichstraße 28, Erlangen, Germany. zhen.guo@fau.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-2563-4674
Wolfgang KiesslingGeoZentrum Nordbayern, Department of Geography and Geosciences, Friedrich-Alexander-Universität Erlangen-Nürnberg, Loewenichstraße 28, Erlangen, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1088-2014

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Regional diversification patterns are increasingly being used to investigate spatial heterogeneity in biodiversity evolution and its drivers. However, estimating and interpreting regional diversification rates is complicated by the fact that regional diversity fluctuations reflect multiple biological processes and may be more sensitive to temporal sampling bias than global patterns. Here, we assess the biological fidelity and sampling sensitivity of regional diversification rates using fossil occurrences of marine invertebrates. We show that immigrations and extirpations account for up to 76% of apparent plate-level generic turnover. Moreover, regional diversity fluctuations are more strongly shaped by preservation, sampling, and tectono-sedimentary history than global patterns. In widely distributed groups, global analyses integrate data across regions and environments, dampen region-specific biases, and recover a higher proportion of shared biological signal. Global analyses therefore remain indispensable for inferring macroevolutionary dynamics over deep time.

Indexed as

Aquatic OrganismsBiodiversityBiological EvolutionFossilsInvertebratesAnimalsPhylogeny

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.