In one paragraphArticle in Translational psychiatry, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
2 · The registryThe trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
3 · Its place in the literatureWho cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
4 · The recordCorrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
5 · Who and what moneyAuthors and funding
17 authors.
Ali GhadamiDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Abhijit SreepadaDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Marvin GanzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Justin BoehmerCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Psychology, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3448-144X Kanya Meyer-DegeringCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Psychology, Berlin, Germany.
Henrik WalterCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy (CCM), Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9403-6121 Jamila AndohDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Falk KieferGerman Center for Mental Health (DZPG), Partner Site Mannheim-Heidelberg-Ulm, Germany.
Emanuel SchwarzDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0261-5063 Markus ReichertDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3290-0962 Ulrich W Ebner-PriemerDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2769-5944 Andreas Meyer-LindenbergDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany.
Christine HeimCharité-Universitätsmedizin Berlin, Corporate Member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin, Institute of Medical Psychology, Berlin, Germany.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6580-6326 Heike TostDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Central Institute of Mental Health, University of Heidelberg, Medical Faculty Mannheim, Mannheim, Baden-Württemberg, Germany. heike.tost@zi-mannheim.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7339-7569 Funding
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (German Research Foundation) Collaborative Research Center TRR 265,project A04
6 · The paper itselfAbstract
Alcohol-related cues are thought to contribute to drinking in alcohol use disorder (AUD), but their contribution in daily life remains difficult to separate from changing social contexts and internal states. We used ecological momentary assessment in two independent cohorts of non-treatment-seeking individuals, comprising a discovery cohort with AUD (17-62 years; n = 73) and a young-adult replication cohort screened for risky drinking (19-35 years; n = 56), to test whether alcohol cue exposure was associated with momentary drinking after simultaneous multivariable adjustment for social context, affective states, and event appraisal. In logistic mixed-effects models, within-person exposure to alcohol-related cues was significantly and reproducibly associated with higher odds of drinking in both cohorts. Being in company, exposure to drinking companions, and higher energetic arousal also showed reproducible within-person associations with drinking. Exploratory clustering of participant-specific slopes suggested meaningful alcohol cue-reactive and social context-reactive risk profile candidates. These findings identify alcohol cue exposure as a robust daily-life correlate of drinking and suggest candidate phenotypes motivating future validation studies of more personalized, context-aware interventions for AUD.
Indexed as
Alcohol DrinkingAlcoholismCuesAdolescentAdultCohort StudiesEcological Momentary AssessmentFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedSocial EnvironmentYoung Adult
What OpenQuestion holds
Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390