ArticleNature communications2026
Explainable data generation from observed small samples by matrix tri-factorization.
Article in Nature communications, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Data generation on small samples has exhibited great potential on real-world biomedical scenarios, especially on extreme cases such as early-stage or emerging biomedical conditions (e.g. Patient Zero of a brand-new disease with only one sample) because of insufficient sample information. Herein, we design an explainable data generation approach under extreme sample scarcity by exploiting inherent low-dimensional principles contained in observed high-dimensional data with comprehensive information, named by Explainable Data Generation (EDG) based on matrix tri-factorization. EDG aims to represent observed small high-dimensional samples by low-dimensional latent representation with a larger rather than equal sample size. This leads to explainable sample generation, due to transparency and interpretable process of decomposition and reconstruction. In experiments, EDG is tested on four tasks of classification, clustering, feature selection and tipping point prediction on simulated and real datasets (single-cell RNA-seq / ATAC-seq data) under extreme sample scarcity, with results demonstrating the superiority of EDG.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42850244What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.