ArticleUltrasound in medicine & biology2026
Characterization of Bubble Cloud Formation and Tissue Ablation Using a High-Frequency Endoscopic Histotripsy System.
Article in Ultrasound in medicine & biology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveHistotripsy is a non-thermal focused ultrasound (US) ablation strategy that non-invasively destroys tissue by generating a cavitation bubble cloud. Prior work has established the potential of histotripsy for many applications, including the non-invasive treatment of liver tumors. To expand histotripsy beyond the currently available clinical systems for targeting deep abdominal tumors, recent work has developed miniaturized high-frequency devices capable of greater precision using devices within an endoscopic form factor. This work investigates the use of one of these high-frequency histotripsy devices to evaluate cavitation generation and ablation capacity in a variety of ex vivo porcine tissues (brain, liver, kidney, pancreas and lymph node) and in vivo murine liver.
methodsA 6.3 MHz histotripsy transducer with an aperture of 10 mm and a focal length of 7 mm was co-registered with a 30 MHz US imaging array. Optical imaging was used to identify the cloud formations for different pulsing cycles, while US imaging was used to monitor ex vivo and in vivo histotripsy ablations in tissue. Histological sections were examined, and statistical analyses were performed on imaging data.
resultsWell-defined bubble clouds ranging from 0.54 ± 0.12 mm to 0.82 ± 0.12 mm (axial) were maintained over the course of 10,000 pulses for 3, 5, 8 and 12 cycles for peak negative pressures (p-) of 33-42 MPa. Larger bubble clouds were generated at a higher p- for all cycles. Pearson correlation coefficients of >0.8 for all cases indicated a strong correlation between US and optical imaging. Histotripsy bubble clouds were identified and maintained on US imaging with hypoechoic zones seen immediately post treatment for all tissue types in both ex vivo and in vivo treatments. Histological results showed complete ablation of the targeted regions in excised porcine brain, kidney, pancreas and lymph nodes. Ex vivo porcine liver exhibited extensive loss of hepatocytes but did retain subtle lobular architecture due to remnants of portal connective tissue. In vivo murine liver showed partial ablation, suggesting that higher treatment doses are required.
conclusionsThese results demonstrate the potential of miniaturized high-frequency histotripsy devices for precise and effective histotripsy ablation across a wide range of potential applications and establish the potential of this device for use in preclinical murine histotripsy studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.