ArticleBrachytherapy2026
Deep learning-assisted needle artifact suppression for enhanced anatomical visualization in prostate high-dose-rate brachytherapy ultrasound imaging.
Article in Brachytherapy, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
purposeImplanted needles introduce acoustic artifacts that degrade transrectal ultrasound (TRUS) images during high-dose-rate (HDR) prostate brachytherapy, complicating ultrasound-only contouring. We developed an artificial intelligence (AI) needle eraser to remove needles and associated artifacts and facilitate structure delineation.
methodsTRUS images from 120 patients undergoing HDR prostate brachytherapy were retrospectively collected. Three-dimensional volumes were acquired immediately before and after needle insertion. A Cycle Generative Adversarial Network (CycleGAN) was trained to transform postneedle images into needle-free images. Two physicians independently rated clinical utility for prostate and urethra delineation using a four-point scale (1 = poor; 4 = excellent). Prostate and urethra contours from preneedle and needle-erased images were compared with clinical reference contours using Dice similarity coefficient (DSC).
resultsThe AI tool suppressed needles and associated artifacts, improving visualization of the prostate and urethral lumen. Mean reader scores were 3.80 ± 0.43 for prostate and 3.75 ± 0.37 for urethra delineation. Compared with preneedle contours, needle-erased contours showed higher agreement with clinical references: prostate DSC increased from 0.91 to 0.93, and urethra DSC increased from 0.70 to 0.89.
conclusionsA CycleGAN-based needle eraser can generate needle-free ultrasound images from postinsertion scans and improve visualization and contour agreement for physician delineation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.