SynthesisKorean journal of radiology2026
Radiofrequency Ablation for Low-Risk T1N0M0 Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
Synthesis in Korean journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectiveTo evaluate the efficacy and safety of ultrasound (US)-guided radiofrequency ablation (RFA) for low-risk T1N0M0 papillary thyroid carcinoma (PTC), with emphasis on T1a versus T1b outcomes and longitudinal volume regression. MATERIALS AND
methodsMEDLINE, EMBASE, Cochrane Library, and KoreaMed databases were searched for studies published between January 2000 and March 2025. Both single-arm and comparative studies were eligible when RFA outcome data could be extracted independently. Thirty-five studies (9,787 tumors) were included in the analysis. Pooled estimates for complete disappearance, persistent tumors, disease progression, and complication rates were calculated using random-effects models. The volume-reduction ratio (VRR) was assessed at sequential follow-up intervals. Subgroup analyses were used to compare the outcomes for T1a and T1b PTCs.
resultsAmong the 9,787 RFA-treated tumors, the pooled complete disappearance rate was 87.2% (I² = 97.9%). The pooled persistent-tumor rate was 0.1% (I² = 57.6%), and the pooled disease-progression rate, which reflected newly developed tumors (0.8%; I² = 63.9%) and lymph node metastasis (0.2%; I² = 19.8%), was 1.3% (I² = 70.0%). The VRR increased from 63.4% at 6 months to 88.7% at 12 months and reached 97.9% at 24 months. The pooled complication rate was 2.7% (I² = 93.0%), and the major complication rate was 0.02% (I² = 0%). Subgroup analyses showed lower complete disappearance rates (89.2% vs. 58.8%;
conclusionUS-guided RFA may provide effective tumor control with favorable safety in low-risk T1N0M0 PTC. However, heterogeneity across several efficacy outcomes limits the interpretability of these estimates. T1b PTCs showed lower complete disappearance and higher persistent-tumor rates than T1a PTCs, supporting the need for heightened surveillance of T1b disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.