ReviewKorean journal of radiology2026
Is Vibe Coding a 'Fire of Prometheus' for Non-Developer Clinicians, Especially Clinical Radiologists?
Review in Korean journal of radiology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Vibe coding is a workflow in which users describe the desired software behavior in natural language, following which large language models (LLMs) generate the code. It is increasingly being used by non-developer clinicians without any formal programming training to create tools that support the clinical workflow. This development is both timely and consequential for radiology, one of the specialties both most exposed to artificial intelligence (AI)-driven automation and best positioned to adopt it owing to its longstanding engagement with imaging AI, digital infrastructure, and information system workflows. Therefore, radiologists may become not merely passive AI users, but also clinical workflow orchestrators. This opportunity is illustrated by a structured prostate magnetic resonance imaging reporting tool, vibe-coded by a non-developer radiologist in approximately four hours, with an institution-based voluntary, radiologist-led coding community. This investigation highlighted four cautions: erosion of domain expertise, risks to security and patient data, absence of peer feedback, and uncoordinated proliferation of tools. A minimum safeguard set for clinician-built tools was proposed. As previously framed, LLMs represent a "fire of Prometheus" for non-native English-speaking researchers. Similarly, vibe coding may warm and burn radiologists equally, with its impact determined less by technology than by how responsibly the specialty adopts it.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.