Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42849511›Full record

ArticleAorta (Stamford, Conn.)2026

Marfan Syndrome versus Loeys-Dietz Syndrome after Aortic Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Reconstructed Time-to-Event Data.

Johannes Fischer, Steve Wehner, Ayodeji Arobo, Abdullah Almehandi, Felipe S Passos, Christian Eitel, Hristo Kirov, Xander Jacquemyn, Ibrahim Sultan, Torsten Doenst and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Aorta (Stamford, Conn.), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Johannes FischerFriedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Germany, Jena.
Steve WehnerFriedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Germany, Jena.
Ayodeji AroboCollege of Health Sciences, Obafemi Awolowo University, Medical School, Nigeria, Ile-ife.
Abdullah AlmehandiUniversity College London, Department of Cardiovascular Science, United Kingdom, London.
Felipe S PassosMaterDei Hospital, Department of Thoracic Surgery, Bahia, Brazil, Salvador.ORCID 0009-0001-7381-2806
Christian EitelWest German Heart and Vascular Center, University Hospital Essen, Department of Cardiology and Vascular Medicine, Germany, Essen.
Hristo KirovFriedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Germany, Jena.
Xander JacquemynUPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Pennsylvania, United States, Pittsburgh.
Ibrahim SultanUPMC Heart and Vascular Institute, University of Pittsburgh Medical Center, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Pennsylvania, United States, Pittsburgh.
Torsten DoenstJena University Hospital, Universitatsklinikum Jena, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Germany, Jena.
Tulio CaldonazoFriedrich-Schiller-University Jena, Department of Cardiothoracic Surgery, Germany, Jena.ORCID 0000-0001-5697-2659

Funding

Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft 413668513Deutsche Herzstiftung S/03/23
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Marfan syndrome (MFS) and Loeys-Dietz syndrome (LDS) are hereditary connective tissue diseases, both characterized by aortic root and vessel involvement with an increased risk of aneurysms and dissections. Despite advances in surgical techniques and improved postoperative follow-up, the impact of surgery on long-term outcomes in these patient groups is still unknown. Methods: We performed a systematic review and a meta-analysis to compare the postoperative long-term events. The main outcome was long-term survival. Additional outcomes were freedom from dissection and reoperation. After reconstruction of time-to-event data for the individual survival analysis, pooled Kaplan-Meier curves for the endpoints were generated. Results: A total of 1,794 studies were identified, of which 5 were included in the analysis, encompassing 1,005 patients (MFS: 778; LDS: 227). With MFS as the reference group, there was no significant difference in long-term survival between both groups, based on age (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.919; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.58-1.45; Conclusion: Although long-term survival is similar between MFS and LDS patients, those with LDS face a significantly higher risk of aortic dissection and reoperation. This elevated risk may be partly explained by the intrinsic genotypic heterogeneity of the LDS population. However, our pooled analysis could not fully adjust for this heterogeneity, underscoring the need for vigilant lifelong imaging surveillance and individualized surgical thresholds in LDS.

Identifiers

PMID42849511
PMCPMC13657142

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.