Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42849063›Full record

Trial reportJournal of medical Internet research2026

Estimating the Economic Value of Supported Online Parent-Led Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Prevent Child Anxiety Problems: Economic Evaluation of the MYCATS Cluster Randomized Controlled Trial.

Shuye Yu, Tessa Reardon, Obioha C Ukoumunne, Rebecca Njuguna, Helen Dodd, Gemma Halliday, Clare Hill, Bec Jasper, Benjamin Jones, Peter J Lawrence and 6 more

Abstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Journal of medical Internet research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors.

Shuye YuNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, England, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom, +44 (0)1865 289265.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2073-7574
Tessa ReardonOxford Centre for Emerging Minds Research, Departments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9298-091X
Obioha C UkoumunneExeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0551-9157
Rebecca NjugunaNuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, England, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom, +44 (0)1865 289265.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2378-3215
Helen DoddExeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1446-5338
Gemma HallidayOxford Centre for Emerging Minds Research, Departments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Clare HillSchool of Psychology and Clinical Language Sciences, University of Reading, Reading, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-5639-1396
Bec JasperParents and Carers Together, Suffolk, England, United Kingdom.
Benjamin JonesExeter Medical School, University of Exeter, Exeter, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7374-1107
Peter J LawrenceSchool of Psychology, University of Southampton, Southampton, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6181-433X
Fran MorganSquare Peg, Brighton and Hove, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8883-0812
Anna PlaczekOxford Centre for Emerging Minds Research, Departments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-6745-5996
Ronald M RapeeSchool of Psychological Sciences, Macquarie University, Sydney, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1724-1076
MYCATS TeamOxford Centre for Emerging Minds Research, Departments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.
Mara Violato *Nuffield Department of Population Health, University of Oxford, Old Road Campus, Oxford, England, OX3 7LF, United Kingdom, +44 (0)1865 289265.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0484-7706
Cathy Creswell *Oxford Centre for Emerging Minds Research, Departments of Experimental Psychology and Psychiatry, University of Oxford, Oxford, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1889-0956

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Childhood anxiety disorders are common and lead to substantial negative long-term outcomes in various life domains. Although digital interventions for preventing childhood anxiety problems have been increasingly used in the recent decade, there is limited evidence documenting their cost-effectiveness (CE). Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the CE of a parent-led online cognitive behavioral therapy with therapist support (OSI+TS) alongside usual school practice (USP), compared to USP alone for children aged 4-7 years at risk of anxiety disorders identified through universal school screening. Methods: The economic evaluation was conducted alongside the MYCATS trial (N=865), a parallel group, superiority cluster randomized trial across 95 primary or infant schools in England. Schools were randomized (1:1) to OSI+TS or USP, stratified by school-level deprivation. The primary analyses, at 12 months after randomization, considered child quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) as the health economic outcome, using both the UK adult and the Australia adolescent value sets, and costs were from the National Health Service and Personal Social Services perspective. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were compared to the UK National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) recommended threshold of £20,000-£30,000 (£1=US $1.35 as of September 10, 2026) per QALY gained, as per predefined Health Economics Analysis Plan. Sensitivity analyses included a societal perspective and the application of the new NICE cost-effectiveness threshold. Results: Children receiving OSI+TS gained 0.021 (95% CI 0.010-0.033; Conclusions: OSI+TS is cost-effective compared to usual school provision, supporting its future implementation for children at risk of anxiety problems.

Indexed as

AnxietyAnxiety DisordersCognitive Behavioral TherapyParentsChildChild, PreschoolCost-Benefit AnalysisCost-Effectiveness AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleQuality-Adjusted Life Yearsanxiety disorderschild healthcognitive behavioral therapycost-effectiveness analysisdigital applicationeconomic evaluationonline interventionparent-led CBTpreventive health servicesrandomized controlled trial

Identifiers

PMID42849063
PMCPMC13649241

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.