ArticleJMIR formative research2026
Clustering-Based Accelerometer Measures of Physical Activity Patterns in Children With Overweight or Obesity: Baseline Cross-Sectional Methodological Analysis.
Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Accelerometers produce high-resolution physical activity data, but commonly used summary measures often reduce these data to total volume, intensity, or variability and may not retain interpretable temporal structure across the day. Cluster-based summaries may provide a way to characterize daily physical activity profiles while preserving information about when activity occurs. Objective: This study evaluated whether cluster-derived accelerometer summary measures could represent daily physical activity patterns and explain variation in pediatric cardiometabolic outcomes comparably to traditional accelerometer summary metrics. Methods: This baseline cross-sectional methodological analysis used data from 268 Latino children with overweight or obesity from low-income families participating in the Stanford GOALS trial. Participants were aged 7 to 11 years old and wore accelerometers for a minimum of 1 week according to study protocol. Valid daily activity profiles were summarized within a 7:00 AM-11:00 PM analytic window using consecutive, nonoverlapping 10-minute intervals. Daily profiles were clustered using unsupervised learning, and participant-level cluster-derived measures were created from the distribution of valid days assigned to each cluster. We compared these measures with traditional accelerometer summaries, including time spent in activity intensity states, Time Active Mean, Time Active Variability, Activity Intensity Mean, and Activity Intensity Variability. Linear regression models were used to evaluate associations with waist circumference, fasting insulin, and fasting triglycerides, adjusting for age and sex. Model performance was compared using Results: Cluster-derived measures explained a comparable proportion of variation in the 3 cardiometabolic outcomes to traditional accelerometer summary metrics. For example, the highest Conclusions: Cluster-derived accelerometer measures provide a regression-ready approach for summarizing daily physical activity patterns while preserving interpretable clock-time structure. In this baseline analysis, these measures performed comparably to traditional accelerometer summaries while capturing temporal features not represented by conventional volume- or intensity-based metrics. Future work should evaluate external validation across diverse populations and settings and assess the use of these measures in longitudinal and intervention analyses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.