Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42849019›Full record

ArticleJMIR research protocols2026

Nurse-Led and Nurse-Involved Antimicrobial Stewardship in Hospitals and Primary Care: Protocol for a Mixed Methods Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis With Gulf Cooperation Council and Middle East and North Africa Subgroup Analysis.

Suthan Pandarakutty, Brenda Poku, Shanthi Ramasubramaniam, Sylivia Nalubega, Mansour Mansour, Manju Varghese, Lakshmi Renganathan, Vijith Chandu, Virgina Varghese, Faiza Al Zadjali and 1 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR research protocols, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors.

Suthan PandarakuttyDepartment of Nursing, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8386-7835
Brenda PokuSchool of Sociology and Social Policy, University of Nottingham, Law and Social Science Building, University Park, Nottingham, England, NG3 3EW, United Kingdom, 44 7974103283.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2265-7041
Shanthi RamasubramaniamSchool of Health and Social Well-Being, Faculty of Health and Applied Sciences, University of the West of England, Bristol, England, United Kingdom.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0411-7639
Sylivia NalubegaDepartment of Nursing, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0756-5819
Mansour MansourDepartment of Nursing, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5728-6431
Manju VargheseDepartment of Nursing, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9979-4661
Lakshmi RenganathanMinistry of Health, Oman College of Health Sciences, Muscat, Oman.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4181-3007
Vijith ChanduDepartment of Nursing, Fatima College of Health Sciences, Abu Dhabi, United Arab Emirates.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-1898-3140
Virgina VargheseCollege of Applied and Health Sciences, A'Sharqiyah University, Ibra, Oman.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-9543-3675
Faiza Al ZadjaliOman Medical Specialty Board, Muscat, Oman.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1077-0362
Vishnu RenjithSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, Royal College of Surgeons in Ireland, Dublin, Leinster, Ireland.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3718-8399

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Antimicrobial resistance poses a growing threat to patient safety worldwide. Nurses are central to antimicrobial management; however, their contribution to formal antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) programs remains poorly characterized. To our knowledge, no previous review has combined evidence on the effectiveness and implementation of nurse-led and nurse-involved AMS interventions, including Gulf Cooperation Council and Middle East and North Africa (GCC/MENA) subgroup analysis. Objective: This protocol describes a mixed methods systematic review that aims to determine (1) the effectiveness of nurse-led or nurse-involved AMS interventions on patient and antimicrobial outcomes in hospital and primary care settings and (2) the barriers and facilitators influencing this implementation using the Consolidated Framework for Implementation Research (CFIR 2.0). Methods: This review follows the Joanna Briggs Institute convergent, parallel-streams mixed methods methodology. Eligible studies report a nurse-led or nurse-involved AMS intervention among adults receiving antimicrobial therapy in hospital or primary care settings; pediatric-only and long-term care settings are excluded. Eleven databases will be searched from January 2000 to the calendar month of searching. Two reviewers will independently screen records in 2 rounds, with agreement quantified by Cohen κ (target ≥0.70). The quantitative stream will include randomized, quasi-experimental, interrupted time series, and controlled before-and-after studies, with effect measures matched to outcome type. Risk of bias will be independently assessed using design-matched tools. Random-effects meta-analysis will be the primary approach, with prediction intervals supplementing Results: Database searches, Covidence import, and deduplication were completed in March 2026. Title and abstract screening, including pilot calibration, was completed by June 2026. Full-text screening was planned for completion by August 2026, followed by parallel quantitative and qualitative data extraction from August to September 2026. Meta-analysis, CFIR thematic synthesis, and GRADE assessment are expected by November 2026, with mixed methods integration planned for November to December 2026. Manuscript writing is planned for January to February 2027, with submission targeted for March 2027. No amendments to the registered protocol have occurred. Conclusions: This review is intended to provide one of the first meta-analytic syntheses of nurse-led and nurse-involved AMS clinical effectiveness alongside a structured implementation analysis. Findings may inform stewardship program design, nursing education, and health policy, particularly in GCC/MENA settings where nursing AMS evidence is scarce.

Indexed as

Antimicrobial StewardshipAfrica, NorthernHospitalsHumansMeta-Analysis as TopicMiddle EastPrimary Health CareSystematic Reviews as Topicantibiotic consumptionantimicrobial stewardshipbarriers and facilitatorsGRADEGulf Cooperation Councilimplementation sciencemeta-analysismixed methods systematic reviewnurse-ledprotocol

Identifiers

PMID42849019
PMCPMC13649170

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.