Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42848988›Full record

ArticleJMIR formative research2026

A Physical Activity Intervention for High-Risk Mothers Whose Children Play Sports: Qualitative Analysis of Exit Interviews From Two Pilot Studies.

Sugandha K Gupta-Louis, Belinda O'Hagan, Naomi Raisman, Gabriel Prieto, Michael C Onu, Bess H Marcus, Tayla von Ash

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JMIR formative research, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Sugandha K Gupta-LouisFerkauf Graduate School of Psychology, Yeshiva University, Rousso Building, Room 232, 1165 Morris Park Ave, Bronx, NY, 10461, United States, 1 646-592-4519.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9027-0762
Belinda O'HaganBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0000-8579-1283
Naomi RaismanBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0007-4327-1176
Gabriel PrietoBrown University, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0001-4698-6309
Michael C OnuBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2962-8929
Bess H MarcusBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9440-924X
Tayla von AshBrown University School of Public Health, Providence, RI, United States.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7621-3545

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Mothers, especially those with low socioeconomic status and minoritized identities, encounter barriers to participating in physical activity (PA), a behavior that improves health outcomes. Moms on the Move (MOMs) is a community-based and theory-informed intervention developed to address the PA barriers endorsed by low-income Black and Hispanic mothers. This intervention offered in-person group PA sessions led by a female fitness instructor and held during children's sports practices. The MOMs intervention was piloted in 2022 and 2023; the intervention in 2023 was longer (8-weeks, vs 6-weeks) and included goal-setting calls and written materials. Objective: This study examined the qualitative data from exit interviews of both pilot studies to explore participants' engagement and satisfaction with the intervention. We also sought to identify perceived benefits and barriers to participation, in addition to recommendations for future interventions. Methods: Exit interviews of 19 participants who had enrolled in at least 1 MOMs pilot study were analyzed with directed content analysis. Interviews were approximately 16 minutes on average. Social Cognitive Theory (SCT) and the Transtheoretical Model (TTM) were incorporated as theoretical frameworks for data coding and analysis. Results: Around half the participants identified as Black or Hispanic and reported an annual household income of ≤US $40,000. Participants were generally satisfied with the intervention, noting benefits including increased motivation to maintain PA beyond the duration of the intervention. Barriers included scheduling conflicts and inclement weather. Three theory-consistent themes framed participants' evaluation of intervention success: accountability, accessibility, and ability. Accountability referred to support from the in-person group that facilitated motivation. Accessibility was described as the appreciation for resources provided by the intervention, including the provision of exercise equipment. Finally, participants discussed how their shared identity with other participants increased their sense of ability (or self-efficacy) to engage in PA. This was especially true for participants who described little to no engagement in PA prior to the intervention. Conclusions: To our knowledge, the MOMs intervention is the first of its kind: it delivers an in-person group PA intervention to high-risk mothers and women caregivers of children during their children's sports practices. Findings from this study support the intervention's delivery and integration to improve health behaviors, including PA, among mothers with intersectional and marginalized identities from the perspective of participants.

Indexed as

ExerciseHealth PromotionMothersSportsAdultChildFemaleHumansInterviews as TopicPilot ProjectsQualitative Researchcommunity-based researchexercisegenderintervention studyphysical activityprogram evaluationqualitative research

Identifiers

PMID42848988
PMCPMC13649072

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.