ArticlePloS one2026
Confidence in the neurological examination and exam avoidance among medical residents.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
BACKGROUND AND
objectivesNeurophobia is the fear of clinical neurology. Little research has explored how the neurological exam contributes to this fear. We wanted to better understand the confidence that medical residents have with the neurological exam and determine how confidence affects their examination of neurological patients.
methodsThis was a single-centre study in which Internal Medicine and Family Medicine residents rated their confidence in conducting different aspects of a neurological evaluation through a self-administered survey. Low confidence was defined as a score of ≤3 on a 5-point Likert scale. Participants also rated the likelihood of their peers skipping a relevant exam for patients presenting with neurological, cardiac, respiratory, gastrointestinal, or musculoskeletal complaints. Free form responses were sought to understand reasons for skipping.
resultsThere were 97 respondents (35 IM; 61 FM), out of a total of 350 eligible participants. 36 were first year, 45 were second year, and 14 were third year residents. Participants were least confident in localizing (Median = 3; IQR 2-4) and forming a differential (Median 4; IQR 3-4). Confidence did not improve with additional years of training and respondents felt increased exposure to neurology and more teaching would improve their confidence. Participants felt their peers were most likely to skip a neurological (Median = 3; IQR 2-3) or musculoskeletal exam (Median 3; IQR 2-4). Likelihood of skipping part of a neurological exam increased from post-graduate year one to two. Low confidence and lack of time were cited as major contributors.
conclusionResidents appear to be less confident in conducting the non-physical aspects of the neurological exam, including localizing and forming a differential. Low confidence was a major contributor to residents forgoing a neurological exam. More teaching and exposure to neurology were the most common self-reported factors that would improve resident confidence in the physical exam.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.