ArticlePloS one2026
Muscle synergy characteristics during hands-and-knees crawling in children aged 4-6 years.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Hands-and-knees crawling requires complex multi-joint coordination, managed by the central nervous system (CNS) via muscle synergies. While infant crawling is well-studied, neuromotor control in 4-6-year-olds remains under-investigated. This study examined the spatiotemporal consistency and developmental trajectories of muscle synergies during crawling in this age group. Kinematics and surface electromyography (sEMG) from 16 muscles were recorded from 49 healthy children performing self-paced crawling, segmenting ten cycles per participant. Muscle synergies were extracted using non-negative matrix factorization (NMF). Spatiotemporal characteristics were evaluated using cosine similarity (CS) and temporal phase dispersion (Circular SD). An average of 7.82±1.05 muscle synergies were extracted from the 16 recorded muscles, with synergy number increasing significantly with age (p < 0.05). Cluster analysis identified 12 group-level synergies. Proximal-dominated core shared synergies (M4-M7, M11) exhibited high prevalence (73.47%-87.76%) and stable spatial organization (mean CS = 0.68-0.86), without significant age-related differences. Conversely, specific synergies for distal adjustments (M1-M3, M8-M10, M12) showed substantial inter-individual variability in activation timing (Circular SD: 20.68%-44.32%). While their internal structures remained stable, their population prevalence exhibited substantial fluctuations across age groups. These fluctuations, characterized by wide inter-individual variability, suggest that rather than undergoing deterministic neural reorganization, the CNS adopts a "proximal freezing" strategy for basic stability and a "distal freeing" strategy via active sensorimotor exploration to manage redundant degrees of freedom in 4- to 6-year-olds.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.