Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42848810›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Older adults' evaluations of smart home control screen designs: Appearance dimensions and behavioral intentions in a multi-stage study.

Liangming Jia, Qisen Zhang, Weimin Zhai, Zhongzhen Lin, Shasha Li

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Liangming JiaSchool of Media and Arts, Wuxi University, Wuxi, China.
Qisen ZhangUndergraduate Academic Affairs Office, Wuxi Open University, Wuxi, China.
Weimin ZhaiDepartment of Industrial Design, Shenzhen Technology University, Shenzhen, China.
Zhongzhen LinDepartment of Industrial Design, Guangdong University of Technology, Guangzhou, China.
Shasha LiCollege of Engineering, South China Agricultural University, Guangzhou, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3870-261X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

In age-friendly home environments, control screens provide a point of contact between users and smart home systems, and their appearance may shape initial evaluations of these systems. This exploratory study used a multi-stage design to investigate older adults' appearance evaluations and behavioral-intention patterns across different screen designs. Similarity judgments provided by 15 experts were examined using multidimensional scaling and cluster analysis, from which eight representative designs were selected from the original pool of 87 samples. Three independent groups of older adults took part, respectively, in dimension construction, comparative appearance evaluation, and behavioral-intention assessment. Exploratory principal component analysis identified four dimensions specific to the present study: Sturdy and Reliable, Futuristic Technology, High Quality, and Simple and Efficient. In the supplementary entropy-weighted TOPSIS analysis, the two largest data-derived weights were assigned to Sturdy and Reliable (31.3%) and Simple and Efficient (28.8%), and S73 ranked first in the composite appearance evaluation. Preference, willingness to use, and willingness to purchase differed across the eight designs in the Friedman tests (all p < 0.001). S56 had the highest ranking for preference and willingness to use, while S69 ranked highest for willingness to purchase. At the sample level, S73 and S56 performed comparatively well at both stages, although the composite appearance and behavioral-intention rankings did not fully coincide. Because the two sets of outcomes came from independent participant groups, comparisons across the two stages were descriptive only. These findings provide a basis for subsequent development and prototype testing of age-friendly interfaces.

Indexed as

Home EnvironmentIntentionAgedAged, 80 and overCluster AnalysisFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedPrincipal Component Analysis

Identifiers

PMID42848810
PMCPMC13649001

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.