Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42848780›Full record

Trial reportPloS one2026

Reach and engagement in the ECAIL trial targeting socially disadvantaged families across the COVID-19 pandemic and cost-of-living crisis: A mixed-methods implementation study.

Delphine Poquet, Camille Le Gal, Pascale Hincker, Laurent Béghin, Dominique Deplanque, Damien Subtil, Oriane Sion, Benjamin Cavalli, Lucie Vanhoutte, Victoria Jacobsen and 7 more

Registry-linked trialAbstract readMulticenter StudyRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT03003117 (Effectiveness of an Early Intervention Aiming at Promoting Healthy Diet, Lifestyle and Growth of Children Living in Situation of Social Disadvantage), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT03003117 naactive not recruitingnot on this map

Effectiveness of an Early Intervention Aiming at Promoting Healthy Diet, Lifestyle and Growth of Children Living in Situation of Social Disadvantage : the prEgnanCy and eArly Childhood nutrItion triaL (ECAIL)

TypeinterventionalSponsorFrench Red CrossRan2017 to 2026Enrolled800ConditionsDiet, Growth, Infant, Physical ActivityArmsExperimental: Intervention Program, Active comparator: Usual Care
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

17 authors.

Delphine PoquetUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Paris, France.
Camille Le GalUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Paris, France.
Pascale HinckerUniversité Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Clinical Investigation Center, CIC 1403, Lille, France.
Laurent BéghinUniversité Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Clinical Investigation Center, CIC 1403, Lille, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5369-3910
Dominique DeplanqueUniversité Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, Clinical Investigation Center, CIC 1403, Lille, France.
Damien SubtilUniversité Lille, Women and Newborn Mother Unit, CHU Lille, EA 2694, METRICS, Evaluation of Health Technologies and Medical Practices, Lille, France.
Oriane SionResearch and Content Department, Association Programme Malin, Paris, France.
Benjamin CavalliResearch and Content Department, Association Programme Malin, Paris, France.
Lucie VanhoutteUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8502-0830
Victoria JacobsenUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0281-9454
Ketevan MarrUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7755-7382
Ioannis SakellarisUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8687-3512
Blandine de Lauzon GuillainUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Paris, France.
Marie-Aline CharlesUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Paris, France.
Delphine LeyUniversité Lille, Inserm, CHU Lille, INFINITE - Institute for Translational Research in Inflammation, Lille, France.
Priscille SauvegrainUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Paris, France.
Sandrine LioretUniversité Paris Cité and Université Sorbonne Paris Nord, Inserm, INRAE, Centre for Research in Epidemiology and Statistics, Paris, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2483-7820

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe ECAIL trial, launched in 2017, was designed to evaluate a multicomponent intervention for childhood obesity prevention among hard-to-reach families. At a maternity hospital in Lille, France, healthcare providers screened pregnant women experiencing social vulnerability, and dietitians delivered a home-based intervention until age 2. The COVID-19 pandemic led to a six-month suspension in 2020. This study compared eligibility and participation before the pandemic and after resumption, and examined how implementation and reach evolved across the pandemic and subsequent cost-of-living crisis.

methodsUsing a convergent mixed-methods design, we analyzed 5,744 eligibility questionnaires distributed at the maternity ward and conducted a focus group with six dieticians delivering the intervention to triangulate quantitative implementation indicators with qualitative implementation data. Inclusion criteria included ≥1 indicator of social vulnerability (e.g., socioeconomic disadvantage, precarious housing, or social isolation). The focus group was recorded, transcribed, and analyzed thematically focusing on reach, acceptability, and adaptation.

resultsEligibility increased from 29.7% (n = 955) pre-pandemic to 33.6% (n = 849) after resumption, while the distribution of vulnerability criteria remained similar across periods: 78.3% received social/medical benefits; employment was not the main source of household income for 58.7%; 24.4% experienced financial hardship; 14.7% reported social isolation; 6.0% lived in precarious housing; and 19.0% had three or more vulnerabilities. Participation among eligible women remained stable (24.6%; n = 443). Qualitative findings indicated dietitians' satisfaction and participants' enthusiasm for the resumption of home visits, particularly in addressing social isolation. After resumption, the introduction of a pre-visit COVID-19 questionnaire was associated with fewer failed home visits. Integration of quantitative and qualitative findings indicated sustained, and in some cases strengthened, provider engagement despite pandemic-related strain on hospital services.

conclusionsThis study suggests that a complex intervention can maintain reach and acceptability through adaptive implementation under major contextual disruptions. The rapid resumption of home-based services emerged as a promising implementation strategy for engaging and retaining socially disadvantaged families, highlighting the importance of flexible, context-sensitive approaches during social and economic crises.

trial registrationClinicaltrials.gov NCT03003117; registration date: 21/12/2016; https://clinicaltrials.gov/study/NCT03003117.

Indexed as

COVID-19Social VulnerabilityAdultChild, PreschoolFemaleFocus GroupsFranceHumansPandemicsPregnancySurveys and QuestionnairesVulnerable Populations

Identifiers

PMID42848780
PMCPMC13649008

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.