ArticlePLoS pathogens2026
Receptor-induced activation of MERS-CoV spike revealed by time-course cryo-EM.
Article in PLoS pathogens, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The Middle East respiratory syndrome coronavirus (MERS-CoV) initiates infection by engaging its host receptor dipeptidyl peptidase 4 (DPP4), which activates the viral spike (S) glycoprotein. However, how receptor binding is structurally coupled to membrane fusion has remained unclear. Here, using cryo-electron microscopy, we determined structures of MERS-CoV spike-DPP4 complexes at defined incubation times, capturing a series of conformational states spanning prefusion, receptor-bound, and postfusion conformations. These structures reveal that receptor-binding domain (RBD) opening progressively weakens S1-S2 interactions, while DPP4 binding may induce conformational drift and loosening of the S2 fusion core. These structural changes might destabilize spike trimers, promote S1 dissociation, and prime the fusion machinery. Compared with the SARS-CoV-2 spike, the MERS-CoV spike exhibits greater conformational plasticity, consistent with a lower threshold for receptor-induced fusion. In addition, the postfusion S2 structure suggests that the HR2 upstream linker may function as a conformational switch during six-helix bundle assembly. Together, these findings outline a structural pathway. for receptor-induced activation of the MERS-CoV spike and provide a structural framework for the development of antiviral strategies targeting dynamic fusion intermediates.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.