ArticlePloS one2026
Systematic review and network meta-analysis of interventions for adults with simple obesity: Study protocol.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Obesity has become a major global public health challenge, and its rising prevalence contributes to substantial health and economic burdens. Existing systematic reviews are largely confined to a single intervention category or to mixed populations, which limits targeted recommendations for adults in whom obesity itself, rather than an established metabolic comorbidity, is the principal clinical concern. This protocol describes a systematic review and network meta-analysis comparing dietary, physical activity, behavioural and pharmacological interventions in adults with simple obesity, pragmatically defined as trial populations in which obesity itself is the primary inclusion criterion. We will search PubMed, Embase and the Cochrane Library from inception to the search date for randomised controlled trials. Two reviewers will independently screen records, extract data and assess risk of bias using the Cochrane Risk of Bias 2 tool. The principal primary outcome will be percentage change in body weight at the end of an intervention period of at least 24 weeks. Key secondary outcomes will include the proportion of participants achieving at least 5% weight loss, separate measures of central obesity, and health-related quality of life. Pairwise and network meta-analyses will be conducted under a frequentist random-effects framework, and small-study effects will be examined with funnel plots and regression-based tests. Subgroup analyses and meta-regression will explore prespecified effect modifiers, and the credibility of important subgroup findings will be judged with the ICEMAN instrument. Certainty of evidence will be assessed using the GRADE framework. Depending on the quality, consistency and certainty of the available evidence, the findings may inform clinical decision-making, future guideline development and research priorities. This review is registered with PROSPERO (CRD420251236477).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.