ArticlePloS one2026
Health system and household costs of preventive treatment delivery for children exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis in South Africa.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
12 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundTuberculosis (TB) preventive treatment (TPT) is a core component of TB control. Levofloxacin was recently recommended by the World Health Organization as TPT in children exposed to multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). However, the affordability and feasibility of TPT provision for governments, health services, individual households and global donors is uncertain.
methodsThis costing analysis used empirical data collected alongside the TB-CHAMP clinical trial which investigated levofloxacin TPT in children exposed to MDR-TB in South Africa. We modelled the societal (health system and household) cost of levofloxacin TPT, other potential future (but not currently recommended) MDR-TB exposure TPT options and compared with drug-susceptible TPT options in children and adolescents under 15 years old. We modelled costs across 12 different medicine and formulation options for 11 paediatric dosing weight-bands using TB-CHAMP and household survey data, with national and international procurement medicine pricing.
resultsTotal societal costs of providing levofloxacin TPT and its monitoring per child were US$252 (0- < 5 years) and US$256 (5- < 15-years) and had comparable costs to drug-susceptible TPT regimens when using Global Drug Facility pricing. Pharmaceutical costs for a course of TPT using child-friendly formulations in children <5 years varied between US$38 (levofloxacin), US$80 (bedaquiline) and US$582 (delamanid). Household costs associated with accessing TPT and ongoing monitoring ranged from 1.6%-2.1% of median annual income of affected households, with shorter TPT courses incurring lower household costs. Global Drug Facility procurement achieved TPT pricing at 70% of the costs of national South African procurement, and enabled access to a wider range of child-friendly formulations. DISCUSSION: Costs of TPT are influenced by factors including medicine pricing and procurement, the use of child-friendly formulations, implementation approach, the duration of treatment, and choice of TPT regimen across weight and age distributions. Costs to households are relatively small but may be significant for impoverished households already managing the financial disruption of a family member with MDR-TB disease.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.