ArticlePLOS global public health2026
Digital health education needs for women with urinary incontinence in Kigali Rwanda, a phenomenological qualitative study.
Article in PLOS global public health, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Urinary incontinence (UI), an involuntary loss of urine, is a widespread pelvic floor disorder affecting 20-50% of women worldwide, with a 21% prevalence in Sub-Saharan Africa. Contributing factors include genetics, childbirth, and chronic conditions, leading to significant physical, social, and emotional challenges such as fear of leakage and isolation. Despite its impact, many affected women lack awareness of UI and available treatments, which include medication, surgery, and pelvic floor muscle training (PFMT). Knowledge gaps and misconceptions persist, hindering timely diagnosis and management. In response to these challenges, healthcare systems in Africa are adopting digital technologies (DTs), including WhatsApp and social media, to facilitate patient education and professional collaboration. Studies indicate that digital platforms can support women in managing UI, particularly through PFMT. However, little is known about women's digital health education needs, barriers, and platform preferences. This study explored these aspects among women with UI in Kigali through a phenomenological qualitative approach across four hospitals: Masaka, Rwanda Military, Kibagabaga, and King Faisal. Using purposive sampling, 20 women aged 20-70 were selected. Data analysis was conducted through thematic analysis using deductive and inductive coding. The findings revealed four key themes. First, there are significant knowledge gaps about UI, necessitating multimodal education to address misinformation and misconceptions. Second, participants regularly use digital devices and the internet, recognizing their benefits and affordability for accessing health information. Third, barriers to digital health education included distrust in the accuracy of online information and financial constraints in maintaining digital devices and internet services. Lastly, participants expressed a strong interest in multimodal digital health education platforms to receive UI-related information. Many women misunderstood UI, often confusing it with aging or other conditions, leading to delayed diagnosis, emotional distress, social withdrawal, financial strain, and reduced quality of life. Although digitally literate, they rarely sought digital health information on UI due to knowledge gaps, financial limitations, and skepticism about online sources. The study underscores the urgent need for accessible and trustworthy digital health education to bridge knowledge gaps, provide support, and enhance UI management among affected women.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.