ArticlePloS one2026
Dual targeting of EGFR signaling and microtubule dynamics enhances replication-associated cellular stress and suppresses tumor growth in gefitinib-resistant non-small cell lung cancer.
Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Acquired resistance to epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)-targeted therapy remains a major obstacle in the treatment of EGFR-mutant non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). This study investigated whether repurposing mebendazole (MBZ), a microtubule-disrupting agent, could restore sensitivity to gefitinib in gefitinib-resistant HCC827 GR5 cells. Gefitinib monotherapy showed minimal cytotoxicity, reducing cell viability only marginally (92.7 ± 1.5%), whereas MBZ significantly decreased viability to 79.7 ± 0.6% at 0.1 µM and 29.7 ± 0.6% at 0.5 µM (p < 0.001). Combination treatment (gefitinib 1 µM + MBZ 0.1 µM) further reduced viability to 37.7 ± 0.6% (p < 0.001). Mechanistically, alkaline comet assay revealed significantly increased single-strand DNA damage in the combination group (tail intensity 22.33 ± 0.56%, p < 0.001), while neutral comet assay confirmed elevated double-strand DNA breaks. MBZ also induced dose-dependent γ-H2AX activation (p < 0.001), supporting replication stress-associated DNA damage signaling. In vivo, combination therapy significantly suppressed tumor growth, prolonging tumor doubling time from 6.2 days in controls to 25 days and increasing growth delay to 18.8 days (p < 0.01), without substantial systemic toxicity. Collectively, these findings identify replication stress vulnerability as a therapeutically exploitable axis and support MBZ repurposing as an adjuvant strategy to overcome gefitinib resistance.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.