Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42848751›Full record

ArticlePloS one2026

Mapping social relevance in affective scenes: A large-scale multidimensional rating study.

Vanessa Mitschke, Francesco Grassi, Alperen Doğaner, Anne Schacht

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PloS one, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Vanessa MitschkeDepartment of Cognition, Emotion and Behavior, Institute of Psychology, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Francesco GrassiDepartment of Cognition, Emotion and Behavior, Institute of Psychology, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2630-3790
Alperen DoğanerDepartment of Cognition, Emotion and Behavior, Institute of Psychology, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.
Anne SchachtDepartment of Cognition, Emotion and Behavior, Institute of Psychology, University of Goettingen, Goettingen, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9471-3842

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Understanding how individuals evaluate social content in affective scenes is crucial for research in emotion, social cognition, and decision-making. However, standardized image databases often lack fine-grained ratings of social dimensions beyond basic emotional content. We present a normative dataset of 296 affective scenes rated by 424 adult participants across six social-affective dimensions: social relevance, emotion sharing, action sharing, interpersonal equality, scene pleasantness, and participatory arousal. Each image was independently coded for objective features such as number of people, face visibility, and gaze direction. All rating dimensions showed excellent interrater reliability. Pleasantness ratings demonstrated strong convergent validity with established valence norms from the International Affective Picture System (IAPS), while arousal ratings differentiated between experienced and participatory arousal, suggesting that the latter captures a distinct affective component. Correlation analyses revealed that social relevance was strongly associated with scene pleasantness and a composite "engagement" factor combining emotion sharing, action sharing, and equality. Notably, the association between pleasantness and social relevance was especially pronounced in scenes depicting single individuals. Linear mixed models further indicated that extraversion showed a tentative positive association with the engagement-social relevance relationship, which did not survive correction for multiple comparisons and requires replication. Other personality traits and empathy did not significantly moderate these relationships. This open-access dataset provides a reliable, multidimensional tool for selecting affective scenes based on both emotional and social-interpersonal features. It supports improved stimulus control and design in a wide range of behavioral and neurocognitive research. By systematically mapping social meaning in static affective scenes, our study advances existing methodological resources and offers empirical insight into the structure of social-affective appraisals. All image codes, mean ratings, and analysis scripts are publicly available via the Open Science Framework.

Indexed as

AffectEmotionsAdolescentAdultArousalFacial ExpressionFemaleHumansMalePhotic StimulationYoung Adult

Identifiers

PMID42848751
PMCPMC13649022

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.