Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42848644›Full record

ArticleRevista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992)2026

Artificial intelligence-driven triage in emergency departments: a comparative study of machine learning approaches.

Ayşe Şule Akan, Sefa Kucuk, Şule Yakar, Mahmut Tutam, Hatice Esen, İbrahim Toker

Abstract readComparative Study
In one paragraph

Article in Revista da Associacao Medica Brasileira (1992), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Ayşe Şule AkanErzurum City Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine - Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0160-7926
Sefa KucukErzurum Technical University, College of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0279-3185
Şule YakarKayseri City Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine - Kayseri, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0885-8445
Mahmut TutamErzurum Technical University, College of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Industrial Engineering - Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2018-5458
Hatice EsenErzurum Technical University, College of Engineering and Architecture, Department of Electrical and Electronics Engineering - Erzurum, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0009-0008-9805-829X
İbrahim TokerKayseri City Hospital, Department of Emergency Medicine - Kayseri, Türkiye.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5346-2116

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveIn emergency departments, accurate and timely triage plays a critical role in prioritizing patient care. Traditional triage often suffers from subjectivity and inconsistency, especially under time pressure and overcrowded conditions. The aim of this study was to evaluate the predictive potential of multiple supervised machine learning models for three-class emergency department triage classification and compare their performance using routinely available triage variables.

methodsWe conducted a comparative analysis of eight supervised machine learning models using a retrospective dataset comprising 510 patient records from the emergency department triage. The dataset included demographic features, vital signs, and chief complaints. A 10-fold cross-validation strategy was employed to evaluate performance in a three-class triage outcome scenario based on urgency levels using accuracy, precision, recall, and F1-score.

resultsAmong the evaluated models, logistic regression, random forest, support vector machine, and majority voting achieved the highest predictive performance, with overall accuracies exceeding 89%. The confusion matrix analysis revealed that low-urgency cases were consistently classified with the highest accuracy across all models, while misclassifications occurred primarily between high-urgency and medium-urgency cases.

conclusionThe results show that machine learning models appear well-suited to support the emergency departments triage decision-making process. Integrating such models into emergency departments workflows can improve patient prioritization, streamline clinical operations, and ultimately contribute to better quality of care.

Indexed as

Artificial IntelligenceEmergency Service, HospitalMachine LearningTriageClassification AlgorithmsHumansLogistic ModelsPrediction AlgorithmsPredictive Learning ModelsRandom ForestReproducibility of ResultsRetrospective Studies

Identifiers

PMID42848644
PMCPMC13649240

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.