ArticleRevista brasileira de enfermagem2026
Content validity of the Scale for Assessing the Risk of Phlebitis in Hospitalized Adults.
Article in Revista brasileira de enfermagem, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesto construct and validate the content of a scale for assessing the risk of phlebitis in hospitalized adult patients using peripheral intravenous therapy.
methodsa methodological study, developed according to DeVellis, in four stages, from January to July 2024. For content validity analysis, Content Validity Ratio (CVR) was calculated, including items that reached a critical point of 0.667 (first round) and 0.538 (second round).
resultsthe scale contained 95 items, including those with a value above the critical point of the CVR. Items that received suggestions from experts and also presented a CVR above the critical point were redacted and retained. A scale containing 28 items, distributed across three dimensions, was constructed.
conclusionsthe scale showed good measures of content validity and response process. Since it was assessed as easy to understand, it became a useful tool for use in the care of patients undergoing peripheral intravenous catheter therapy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.