Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42848400›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2026

LGBTQ+ Disparities in Food Insecurity, Food Assistance Use, and Barriers to Food Assistance.

Austin R Waters, Lauren G Fiechtner, Meghan E Perkins, Man Luo, Michele F Schuckel, Catherine D'Amato, Brittany M Charlton

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Austin R WatersHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.
Lauren G FiechtnerDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Meghan E PerkinsDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Man LuoDivision of Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition, Department of Pediatrics, Mass General Brigham, Boston, Massachusetts.
Michele F SchuckelThe Greater Boston Food Bank, Boston, Massachusetts.
Catherine D'AmatoThe Greater Boston Food Bank, Boston, Massachusetts.
Brittany M CharltonHarvard Medical School, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Food insecurity disproportionately affects lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender, and queer (LGBTQ+) adults, yet population-based data on disparities in food assistance use and barriers to accessing services remain limited. Objectives: To estimate the prevalence of food insecurity and food assistance program use among LGBTQ+ adults in Massachusetts from 2022 to 2024 and identify LGBTQ+-specific barriers to assistance. Design, Setting, and Participants: This repeated cross-sectional analysis used 2022 to 2024 data from the Massachusetts Statewide Food Access Survey, an annual online survey conducted by the Greater Boston Food Bank and Mass General Brigham. Exposure: LGBTQ+ identity, defined using a 2-step measure of sexual orientation and gender. Main Outcomes and Measures: Food insecurity, measured using the 10-item US Department of Agriculture Food Security Survey Module; food pantry and Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program (SNAP) use; and barriers to food assistance access. Weighted prevalence estimates and adjusted prevalence ratios with 95% CIs were calculated by LGBTQ+ status. Results: The sample included 9174 Massachusetts adults (10.4%-12.8% LGBTQ+ across survey years). The prevalence of food insecurity increased significantly from 2022 to 2024 among both non-LGBTQ+ adults (29.8% [95% CI, 27.7%-32.0%] to 33.3% [95% CI, 31.3%-35.3%]) and LGBTQ+ adults (43.7% [95% CI, 37.7%-49.9%] to 54.9% [95% CI, 48.5%-61.1%]). Food pantry and SNAP use among LGBTQ+ adults remained stable over time. Among LGBTQ+ nonusers of food pantries in 2024, the most common barriers to use were wanting to be self-reliant (49.4% [95% CI, 41.6%-57.4%]), embarrassment (37.4% [95% CI, 30.1%-45.2%]), and fear of being identified as a pantry user (35.6% [95% CI, 28.6%-43.3%]); all barriers increased over time and were more commonly reported than among non-LGBTQ+ adults. Common barriers to SNAP use among LGBTQ+ adults in 2024 included wanting to be self-reliant (52.7% [95% CI, 43.4%-61.8%]), concern about taking benefits from someone with more need (44.6% [95% CI, 35.8%-53.7%]), and not knowing how to apply (26.0% [95% CI, 18.5%-35.1%]). In 2024, LGBTQ+ adults frequently endorsed grocery gift cards (42.5% [95% CI, 36.6%-48.7%]), home delivery (42.4% [95% CI, 36.4%-48.6%]), and online ordering (34.0% [95% CI, 28.5%-39.9%]) as strategies to increase pantry use. Conclusions and Relevance: In this cross-sectional study of food insecurity in Massachusetts, over half of LGBTQ+ adults experienced food insecurity in 2024, alongside barriers to food assistance use. Findings highlight the need for multilevel, community-co-created interventions to reduce disparities among LGBTQ+ individuals in food insecurity and improve equitable access to food assistance.

Indexed as

Food AssistanceFood InsecurityFood SupplySexual and Gender MinoritiesAdultCross-Sectional StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMassachusettsMiddle Aged

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.