Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42848299›Full record

ReviewInternational urology and nephrology2026

A reproducible single-surgeon technique for buccal mucosa graft harvest in urethroplasty using circumferential oral retraction: technique description and case series.

Daniela Franco-Buenaventura, Jaime Robayo, Katherine Vallecilla Valencia, Herney Andrés García-Perdomo

Abstract readReview
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Review in International urology and nephrology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Daniela Franco-BuenaventuraDivision of Urology. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Jaime RobayoDivision of Urology. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Katherine Vallecilla ValenciaDivision of Urology. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia.
Herney Andrés García-PerdomoDivision of Urology. Department of Surgery, School of Medicine, Universidad del Valle, Cali, Colombia. herney.garcia@correounivalle.edu.co.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6945-8261

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundBuccal mucosal graft (BMG) urethroplasty is widely considered the standard technique for urethral reconstruction using a graft. Although graft placement techniques have been extensively described, less attention has been given to optimizing graft harvesting. Conventional harvesting methods typically rely on manual retraction by surgical assistants, which may limit surgical autonomy and procedural efficiency.

objectiveTo describe a reproducible technique for buccal mucosal graft harvesting that allows a single surgeon to perform the procedure using a circumferential oral retraction system and topical tranexamic acid for donor-site hemostasis and to report donor-site outcomes in a retrospective case series.

methodsWe describe a step-by-step surgical technique for harvesting buccal mucosa using a circumferential retraction configuration based on the Scott retractor system. This setup provides stable, hands-free exposure of the oral cavity. We harvested the graft through a sharp mucosal incision, followed by submucosal dissection over the buccinator muscle. We achieved donor-site hemostasis with electrocautery and topical tranexamic acid applied with gauze packing, allowing healing by secondary intention. We additionally performed a retrospective review of 33 patients who underwent this technique, assessing donor-site complications at early (< 3 months) and 3-month follow-up, classified using the Clavien-Dindo system.

resultsThe circumferential retraction system provides stable exposure of the oral vestibule, facilitating the identification of anatomical landmarks such as the Stensen duct and enabling a single surgeon to perform graft dissection. Donor-site management includes electrocautery followed by temporary application of tranexamic acid-soaked gauze, with the donor site left to heal by secondary intention. In the retrospective series of 33 patients, donor-site complications occurred in 7 (21.2%) during the early postoperative period, most commonly oral pain (12.1%); donor-site bleeding requiring intervention occurred in one patient (3.0%), managed without surgical revision. At 3 months, only one patient (3.0%) had a persistent complication (perioral sensory loss). No Stensen duct injuries occurred.

conclusionsThis technique provides a practical, reproducible method for harvesting buccal mucosal grafts in single-surgeon practice. Stable circumferential retraction combined with topical tranexamic acid may simplify the procedure, improve surgical ergonomics, and facilitate the donor-site management without compromising established principles of buccal graft preparation. In this cohort, donor-site morbidity was low and comparable to or lower than previously reported series.

Indexed as

Buccal muchosa graftCase-seriesReviewSurgical techniqueUrethroplasty

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.