ReviewCardiovascular intervention and therapeutics2026
Cardiac amyloidosis: what every interventional cardiologist should know.
Review in Cardiovascular intervention and therapeutics, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Cardiac amyloidosis (CA) is increasingly encountered by interventional cardiologists during the evaluation of chest pain, myocardial injury, coronary artery disease, atrial arrhythmias, and aortic stenosis. Its recognition can be challenging because amyloid cardiomyopathy often coexists with common coronary, valvular, and arrhythmic conditions. A key diagnostic clue is discordance: the apparent coronary, valvular, or hemodynamic abnormality does not fully explain the patient's symptoms, myocardial phenotype, low-flow physiology, or persistent high-sensitivity cardiac troponin elevation. This review focuses on clinical situations in which interventional cardiologists should suspect CA. We discuss myocardial ischemia and coronary microvascular dysfunction caused by intramural vascular amyloid deposition, extravascular compression, and impaired vasodilator reserve; atrial arrhythmias and catheter ablation; the frequent coexistence of transthyretin cardiac amyloidosis (ATTR-CM) with aortic stenosis in patients undergoing transcatheter aortic valve implantation; and the complementary roles of echocardiography, cardiac computed tomography, cardiovascular magnetic resonance, bone-avid tracer scintigraphy, and invasive hemodynamic assessment. We also propose a practical cath-lab approach that integrates readily available clinical information, recognizes persistent or disproportionate myocardial injury as a diagnostic red flag, promptly distinguishes light-chain from ATTR amyloidosis, and preserves appropriate treatment of coexisting coronary or valvular disease. For the interventional cardiologist, the central principle is simple: when the lesion does not fully explain the patient, look beyond the lesion.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42848296What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.