ReviewMedical oncology (Northwood, London, England)2026
The impact of genetic polymorphisms in xenobiotic-metabolizing enzymes and the risk of oral cancer: a critical review.
Review in Medical oncology (Northwood, London, England), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) and oral potentially malignant disorders (OPMDs) affect many individuals, where exposure to xenobiotics such as tobacco, alcohol, and betel quid is highly prevalent. Inter-individual variability plays a key role regarding genetic polymorphisms in xenobiotic‑metabolizing enzymes. In this study, we searched PubMed, Scopus and Web of Science (up to April 2026) for observational studies and meta‑analyses evaluating CYP1A1, CYP1B1, CYP2E1, GSTM1, GSTT1, GSTP1 and GSTM3 polymorphisms in OSCC and OPMDs. Twenty-one studies met the inclusion criteria. Data on exposures, genotypes and risk estimates were extracted and synthesized qualitatively. Most studies showed that GSTM1 and/or GSTT1 null genotypes are associated with increased risk of OSCC, particularly in Asian cohorts with heavy tobacco and/or betel quid exposure. CYP1A1 and CYP2E1 variants exhibited more heterogeneous results, but several studies indicated elevated risk in smokers, drinkers and betel quid users. Stronger effects consistently appeared in gene-environment interaction models. Polymorphisms in Phase I and Phase II metabolizing enzymes, especially GSTM1/GSTT1 null and selected CYP1A1/CYP2E1 variants, modulate susceptibility to OSCC in exposed individuals, supporting their potential use in risk stratification and targeted prevention strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42848252What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.