ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Learning curve and short-term outcomes of our first 150 consecutive robotic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass procedures using the Hugo™ RAS system: a single-centre, single-surgeon experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Robotic-assisted Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) is increasingly being adopted as an alternative to conventional laparoscopic surgery. However, data on the learning curve and short-term outcomes of RYGB using the Hugo™ robotic-assisted surgery (RAS) system remain limited. This study assessed the technical feasibility, console-time learning curve, and short-term postoperative outcomes of robotic-assisted RYGB using the Hugo™ RAS system. We conducted a retrospective, single-centre case series of the first 150 consecutive robotic-assisted RYGB procedures performed by a single experienced bariatric surgeon using the Hugo™ RAS system between May 2023 and July 2026. Patient characteristics, console time, postoperative complications, and length of hospital stay were recorded. Complications were classified according to the Clavien-Dindo classification. Segmented regression analysis was used to characterize the console-time learning curve and estimate the breakpoint. Of 150 procedures, 147 were included in the clinical series; three converted to laparoscopy were excluded from statistical analyses. Console-time data were available for 139 cases. Mean console time was 104.6 min and decreased across the sequential series. Segmented regression identified a breakpoint at approximately case 17, after which the decline in console time became less pronounced. The documented complication rate during available follow-up was 7.5%. Mean hospital stay was 2.03 days. No mortality occurred. Robotic-assisted RYGB using the Hugo™ RAS system was technically feasible and associated with a progressive reduction in console time. These findings provide further clinical data on the implementation of Hugo™ RAS for RYGB. Prospective comparative multicentre studies are needed to assess clinical outcomes, reproducibility, and generalizability.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.