ArticleJournal of robotic surgery2026
Navigating decision-making for high-cost robotic surgery in the emergency department: an acute care surgery experience.
Article in Journal of robotic surgery, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Although robotic surgery is increasingly applied in acute care surgery (ACS), the preoperative decision-making process in the emergency department (ED) remains poorly understood. This study evaluated the feasibility and factors associated with choosing high-cost robotic surgery in an acute setting. This single-center retrospective study included ED patients undergoing urgent cholecystectomy between December 2025 and July 2026. Decision-making metrics and sociodemographic factors were compared between robotic (RC) and laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). Multivariable logistic regression identified factors independently associated with choosing RC, and a subgroup analysis evaluated whether the decision was finalized during the ED stay among RC patients. Among 107 patients, 46 (43.0%) underwent RC and 61 (57.0%) underwent LC. RC patients required a longer time from consultation to consent (19.1 vs. 11.4 h, p < 0.001) and more counseling sessions (2.4 vs. 1.1, p < 0.001). Nevertheless, 54.3% of RC patients finalized their decision during their ED stay. Younger age (OR = 0.891, 95% CI 0.813-0.976, p = 0.013), family presence in the ED (OR = 5.001, 95% CI 4.213-5.936, p < 0.001), a greater number of counseling sessions (OR = 1.276, 95% CI 1.064-1.530, p = 0.009), and commercial insurance coverage (OR = 2.235, 95% CI 1.899-2.630, p < 0.001) were independently associated with choosing RC. Among RC patients, younger age and greater family involvement were associated with finalizing the decision during the ED stay (both p < 0.001). High-cost robotic surgery can be integrated into the ACS setting despite a more complex decision-making process. Patient, family, financial, and counseling-related factors were associated with the choice of robotic surgery.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42848239What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.