ArticleFamilial cancer2026
Impact of mainstream genetic testing for breast cancer patients: five-year data from the Parkville Familial Cancer Centre.
Article in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Mainstream genetic testing is a model of care where non-genetics health professionals arrange genetic testing for their patients directly. The Parkville Familial Cancer Centre (PFCC) provides a breast cancer mainstream program; initial two-year outcomes previously reported. With an evolving health landscape, the program has been refined with ongoing evaluation, and we now report on outcomes from the first five years of program operation. Program operation and refinement is outlined, including patient eligibility criteria and gene panel use during the study period. Demographics and outcomes for patients who underwent mainstream genetic testing between September 2017 and March 2022 have been analysed, as well as characteristics of the mainstream clinicians and uptake of genetic testing for at-risk relatives. During the study period, 657 patients underwent mainstream genetic testing at ten hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Pathogenic variant (PV) detection rate was 11.5%, and variant of unknown significance rate was 6.5%. A subset of PV carriers were further analysed, and 75.8% had a change in their treatment plan as a result of the PV. The PFCC saved 1,210 appointments due to the mainstream program. Demand for mainstream genetic testing is increasing, with eligibility criteria expanding. The PFCC mainstream program PV detection rate, PV proband relative cascade testing engagement and PFCC resources saved remain high, in line with other studies. Whilst mainstream models of care can evolve and be tailored, it is paramount that FCC-supported mainstream programs can be sustained as demand increases.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42848235What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.