Evidence map›Paper›PMID 42848235›Full record

ArticleFamilial cancer2026

Impact of mainstream genetic testing for breast cancer patients: five-year data from the Parkville Familial Cancer Centre.

Catherine Beard, Anita Skandarajah, Geoffrey J Lindeman, Aisha Ward, Katrina Monohan, Christy Atkinson, Gregory Bruce Mann, Paul A James

Abstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Familial cancer, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Catherine BeardParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia. Catherine.Beard@vcgs.org.au.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9399-0709
Anita SkandarajahParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7702-4850
Geoffrey J LindemanParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9386-2416
Aisha WardParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Katrina MonohanParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Christy AtkinsonParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.
Gregory Bruce MannUniversity of Melbourne, Melbourne, VIC, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2508-9203
Paul A JamesParkville Familial Cancer Centre, Peter MacCallum Cancer Centre and The Royal Melbourne Hospital, Grattan Street, Melbourne, VIC, 3000, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-4361-4657

Funding

NHMRC Leadership Fellowship and the Breast Cancer Research Foundation 2026004
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Mainstream genetic testing is a model of care where non-genetics health professionals arrange genetic testing for their patients directly. The Parkville Familial Cancer Centre (PFCC) provides a breast cancer mainstream program; initial two-year outcomes previously reported. With an evolving health landscape, the program has been refined with ongoing evaluation, and we now report on outcomes from the first five years of program operation. Program operation and refinement is outlined, including patient eligibility criteria and gene panel use during the study period. Demographics and outcomes for patients who underwent mainstream genetic testing between September 2017 and March 2022 have been analysed, as well as characteristics of the mainstream clinicians and uptake of genetic testing for at-risk relatives. During the study period, 657 patients underwent mainstream genetic testing at ten hospitals in Victoria, Australia. Pathogenic variant (PV) detection rate was 11.5%, and variant of unknown significance rate was 6.5%. A subset of PV carriers were further analysed, and 75.8% had a change in their treatment plan as a result of the PV. The PFCC saved 1,210 appointments due to the mainstream program. Demand for mainstream genetic testing is increasing, with eligibility criteria expanding. The PFCC mainstream program PV detection rate, PV proband relative cascade testing engagement and PFCC resources saved remain high, in line with other studies. Whilst mainstream models of care can evolve and be tailored, it is paramount that FCC-supported mainstream programs can be sustained as demand increases.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsGenetic TestingAdultAgedFemaleGenetic CounselingGenetic Predisposition to DiseaseHumansMiddle AgedVictoriaBreast cancerGeneticsGenetic testingMainstreaming

Identifiers

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.