ArticlePsychopharmacology2026
Appetitive Pavlovian conditioned approach to reward location is reduced by both adrenergic and NMDA receptor antagonism at memory reconsolidation.
Article in Psychopharmacology, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
rationaleAppetitive Pavlovian cues can drive maladaptive reward seeking via stimulus-reward memories. Disrupting memory reconsolidation offers a potential strategy to reduce their influence, but evidence for β-adrenergic blockade with propranolol is inconsistent across behavioural paradigms, particularly relative to NMDA receptor antagonism.
objectivesWe tested whether propranolol disrupts reconsolidation of appetitive sucrose memories in a paradigm involving discriminative pavlovian conditioned approach to the reward location, and compared its effects with those of the most commonly used NMDA receptor antagonist, MK-801.
methodsAdult Lister hooded rats underwent discriminative Pavlovian conditioning. Thirty minutes before a brief memory reminder (non-reinforced or reinforced), rats received systemic drug treatment or saline control. In study 1, MK-801 (0.1 mg/kg) was administered to male rats. In study 2, propranolol (10 mg/kg) was administered to equal numbers of male and female rats. Discriminative approach to the reward location was tested drug-free at 1 and 8 days.
resultsIn study 1, MK-801 impaired subsequent discriminated responding at test. These effects were observed not only when reminder was non-reinforced as in previous successful demonstrations, but also with reinforced reminder. In study 2, Propranolol also impaired subsequent conditioned approach, regardless of reminder type, and the effects were consistent across sexes.
conclusionsPropranolol and MK-801 can both disrupt reconsolidation of appetitive pavlovian memories under conditions that promote memory destabilisation. These findings demonstrate that β-adrenergic blockade can impair appetitive memory reconsolidation in a paradigm of conditioned approach to the reward location, challenging prior null findings and revitalising the potential for propranolol-based interventions in maladaptive reward-seeking behaviours.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42848215What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.