ReviewAbdominal radiology (New York)2026
Advanced cervical cancer and its complications: a cross-sectional imaging review.
Review in Abdominal radiology (New York), 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The assessment of advanced cervical cancer and its complications on cross-sectional imaging remains challenging due to the broad range of disease manifestations, and frequently nonspecific clinical presentation. This pictorial review outlines the essential components that should be systematically addressed in radiology reports when evaluating CT and MRI studies in advanced cervical cancer. To improve diagnostic precision and clinical utility, we summarized the main cervical cancer manifestations in an algorithm to facilitate a comprehensive evaluation of local tumor extent, treatment-related/infectious complications, urinary complications, and metastatic spread, serving as a practical tool for both radiologists and clinicians.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42848194What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.