ArticleDigestive diseases and sciences2026
Disparities in Osteopathic Representation Within Gastroenterology Fellowships.
Article in Digestive diseases and sciences, 2026. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectiveGastroenterology (GI) is a highly competitive fellowship with an overall match rate of approximately 60%, as of 2025. Despite representing roughly 11% of the United States (US) physicians, Doctors of Osteopathic Medicine (DOs) are underrepresented across numerous subspecialties. This study analyzed osteopathic representation among trainees and program leadership of GI fellowships in the US. We hypothesized that DOs would have less representation in training programs and that that trainee representation would correlate with leadership composition.
methodsCross-sectional analysis was conducted of current GI fellowships using publicly available data from fellowship program websites, program-affiliated social media, and Doximity. Faculty leadership data and fellow degree type were collected from each training class year. Statistical analysis was conducted and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant.
results236 fellowship programs were included in this study of which 216 (91.1%) had data available for program leadership and 203 (86%) had data available for fellow composition. DOs were most prevalent in the Northeast region. 25 programs (11.5%) had at least one DO in a senior faculty role. Linear regression analysis demonstrated a strong positive association between regional DO leadership representation and DO fellow representation, with a 9.53% increase in DO fellows for each 1% increase in DO leadership representation (R = 0.9837).
conclusionOsteopathic physicians continue to remain underrepresented in gastroenterology fellowships nationwide. However, osteopathic representation at the fellow and leadership levels demonstrates a strong positive correlation, suggesting that leadership composition plays a meaningful role in fostering diversity within gastroenterology training programs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
42848165What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.